Why do they Persist in Breaking the Web - The RSS Blog
Randy Charles Morin blogs about Really Simple Syndication, RDF, FOAF, The Semantic Web and Social Software.
Copyright 2003-5 Randy Charles Morin
The RSS Blog
<< Previous Main Next >>
Thu, 19 May 2005 17:45:00 GMT
Why do they Persist in Breaking the Web

Earlier this month we blogged considerably about how Google's Web Accelerator was breaking the Web, or showing which Web applications were already broken. That's because we didn't follow the guidelines for doing a POST when the request has the potential to change the state of the resource. Do you think we learned our lesson? Of course not. In fact, I bet most of you haven't even read the Architecture of the Web.  Still hacking. Repeating the same mistakes. Rael has decided that feed:// is the new http://. Web? How many ways may we break thee?


Reader Comments Subscribe

This is best explained in full. The reason Web Accelerator broke 37signals, is because both teams programmed aggressively. 37signals ignored the SHOULD and Google naive thought the SHOULD was a MUST. If you program defensively, pretend the SHOULDs are MUSTs in your code and pretend everybody else ignored the SHOULDs, then nothing should break (famour last words).

At the moment, I don't see how feed:// could cause dataloss. In fact, I doubt it could. But, I could have said the same about non-safe GETs last month.


Type "339":
Top Articles
  1. Unblock MySpace
  2. MySpace
  3. FaceParty, the British MySpace
  4. del.icio.us and sex.com
  5. Blocking Facebook and MySpace
  1. Review of RSS Readers
  2. MySpace Layouts
  3. RSS Stock Ticker
  4. RSS Gets an Enema
  5. Google Reader rejects del.icio.us